California | Proposition 14: Do Away With Political Primaries

by Bill Golden
Bill4DogCatcher.com aka JeffersonConservatives.com

A good idea! … California will offer voters the chance to radically change how leadership gets elected by eliminating political primaries.

Passage of Proposition 14 would establish a general primary where all voters vote for their favorite, without regard to political party.

Under Proposition 14, the top two vote recipients would run against each in the general election.

This could result in:

  • Democrat vs Democrat
  • Republican vs Republican
  • Democrat vs Republican
  • Independent vs …

This could also open the way for third parties to be more successful.

One line of thought in support of Proposition 14 is that our current system encourages the fringe of both Left and Right — political primaries tend to focus on the organizational and rhetorical capabilities of emotional and hot button issues.

An open primary where candidates must appeal to the entire electorate should produce candidates more willing to talk straighter sooner and without regard to pandering to the political extremes.

This is a good idea and gets my vote of approval. I encourage others to support similar approaches across the USA.

===================

From Ballotpedia.org:

Specifically, it would provide for a “voter-nominated primary election” for each state elective office and congressional office in California. Voters could vote in the primary election for any candidate for a congressional or state elective office without regard to the political party affiliations of either the candidate or the voter. Candidates could choose whether or not to have their political party affiliation displayed on the ballot.

The proposition also prohibits political parties from nominating candidates in a primary, although political parties would be allowed to endorse, support or oppose candidates. Elections for presidential candidates, and for members of political party committees and party central steering committees would not fall under the “top two” system.

Californians defeated Proposition 62 in 2004, a similar measure, by 54-46%. State of Washington voters approved a very similar measure, Initiative 872, in 2004, while Oregon voters rejected Measure 65, also a similar measure, in 2008.

The main argument supporters make in favor of Proposition 14 is that it might cause voters to elect more moderate members of the California State Legislature. Opponents make two main arguments. They say that that in states where a similar system is in use, it has not resulted in the election of more moderate politicians, and that if the Proposition 14 is approved, it will result in the destruction of California’s minor and independent political parties.

Posted in Political Process | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off

Perhaps they are listening.

By Al Alborn www.alborn.net

I consider myself a typical independent voter who voted for Obama and lived to regret it. As I come to understand what folks like (Hillary) Clinton, Pelosi, Reid and Obama mean when they label themselves Progressives, I have come to profoundly regret helping put the Democrats “in charge” of the House, Senate and White House. I don’t like it. I’m working on fixing it.

This morning’s Washington Post tells me that perhaps “they” are listening. Congressional Democrats downshift on spending, cut provisions to jobs bill. It’s a start. I expect more. I keep track of the rhetoric on both the left and the right. I’m tired of the left’s vision of “big Government”, “wealth distribution”, “Nationalization”, and the like. The further left you go, the more you run into Progressives who don’t look or sound that different from Socialists.

After spending most of my adult life fighting Socialist Countries, I’ve decided to “trend right” (vote Republican) for the foreseeable future. I am growing weary of people telling me what to think, what to do, and with whom to associate.
Independent voters are about compromise. We seldom find a Candidate that fits all of our requirements. In my case, I’m a Libertarian. That translates into a Fiscal Conservative, Social Liberal, small Government, free market capitalist. Like all voters, the labels don’t tell the whole story. I voted for Obama because he promised a bi-partisan health care solution that would be crafted transparently for all to see and a quick exit from our foreign adventures. From watching our President and the Progressives who support him, I have now come to understand that he is more “talk” than “action.” It’s time to take “action” and return our President to the practice of law and give the Democrats in Congress today the opportunity to pursue new careers more suited to their talents.

I have no desire to be part of a movement devoted to adding the United States to the world’s list of Socialist countries. Frankly, Progressives “scare the hell” out of me. You’ll find me in the tent with the Elephant on it. It turns out that it’s a pretty big tent. Perhaps I’ll see you there.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

U.S. Attempts To Block Constitutional Challenge to States' Challenge of Health Care Reform Law

By Bill Golden
Bill4DogCatcher.com

The Obama administration has now adopted a strategy of trying to preempt court consideration of the constitutionality of the Health Care Reform Act by arguing that states have no legal basis or standing to challenge the Health Care Reform Act.

A secondary Obama administration argument is that Congress has the power to regulate interstate trade and that authority is enough by itself to make the measure constitutional.

The Obama administration challenge is officially being made by Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, now known as ‘Virginia v. Sebelius‘.

Virginia is being made the test case to see if the federal strategy will work. Virginia must respond by June 7th to the federal challenge.

Federal attorneys argue that individuals, not the state, are affected by the requirement to buy health insurance, meaning that the state has no standing to sue over the issue.

CHALLENGE: The Health Care Reform Act forces both individuals to buy something that they did not previously have to (5th Amendment protection – you do not lose rights just because they are not specifically listed in the Constitution; in this case you and I have a right to not buy health care insurance) and the new law forces states to increase their financial support and thus to increase taxes for delivery of medical services (health care high risk pools, medicare, etc.).

Actions by the federal government that classify individuals in a discriminatory manner violate the due process of the fifth amendment. “Discrimination” in this sense is that the Health Care Reform Act forces some individuals, but not others, to purchase health insurance.

A counter argument is that all Americans are required to purchase health insurance, but receive an exemption if they can prove that they purchased a policy personally or through their employer.

A reasoned position by Virginia is that it is representing the collective rights of its citizens in both cases, by protecting both their individual rights and the phantom requirement to increase state taxes in order to provide additional non-federally funded medical services.

Learn more by googling: Virginia v. Sebelius and Fifth Amendment Due Process


Fifth Amendment, U.S. Constitution

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.’

Posted in Fifth (5th) Amendment, Health Care | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

America's new culture war: Free enterprise vs. government control

By Al Alborn www.alborn.net

“A wise and frugal government,” Thomas Jefferson declared in his first inaugural address in 1801, “which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.” He later warned: “To take from one, because it is thought that his own industry and that of his father’s has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.” In other words, beware government’s economic control, and woe betide the redistributors.1 These words are taken from an article that appeared in today’s (Sunday, 23 May, 2010) Washington Post. 1 America’s new culture war: Free enterprise vs. government control

If you want to understand what’s going on in America today, I suggest you read it. For a lot of complicated reasons, I voted for Obama in the last election. I wish I could take that vote back. The referenced article is the best summary of “why”. I’m not alone. We got the Government we deserve… and it’s not very pretty. It’s time to “try again” to reverse a Progressive trend towards large, intrusive Government and return to our roots: a Constitutional Government operating within the framework of enumerated powers.

We don’t have to agree on everything. To be a successful Democracy, we do have to respect one another’s opinion when we disagree. I disagree with the President and the democratically controlled Congress. I plan to do what I can to restore a respect for the Constitution be “trending right” with my time, my money, and my rhetoric for the foreseeable future.

People actually interested in talking about this issue will usually find me at the Starbucks on the corner of Hoadly Road and the Prince William Parkway every Wednesday afternoon at 1:00. I’ll always leave a comment on my latest post if I can’t make it. My opinion is always based upon what I know and have learned to date. I would love to chat with folks who disagree but are at least willing to listen to see if there’s anything I missed in my view of the world.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off

It's time to pay attention to Korea…

By Al Alborn www.alborn.net

I’m an “Asia hand” who spent a number of years in various colorful spots over there. I spent a year with the 2nd Infantry Division on the DMZ a long time ago (1973-1974). We were “expendable”. Our mission was to keep the North Korean Army busy for about five minutes while the air and the tank traps were dropped (South Korea has walls of tank traps across countryside near the DMZ. There are sections cut out and “lifted” ready to drop sealing those on the north side out. That would include the North Korean Army and the 2nd Infantry Division). It was a given that Seoul would be destroyed in that five minutes by North Korean artillery. We were a combat unit that worked hard, played hard, and conditioned to expect an invasion at any time. I was a platoon leader at the time.

Because of my experiences there, I have always kept an eye on Korea. Wars start in the most unlikely places for the most unexpected reasons (The assassination of an Archduke, for example). While we hope that China’s recent influence on North Korea will calm things down and the West’s sanctions might help a bit, it’s important to know that our efforts threaten the status quo: The privilege of the North Korean Military machine. Frankly, I’m not that sure Kim Jung-Il is really in charge anymore. He’s almost 70 and reportedly in very ill health. Kim Jong-un, the 25-year-old youngest son of dictator Kim Jong-il, is the likely heir. For reasons apparent to my fellow Korea watchers, he’s probably not the best choice. The “ball to watch” is the North Korean military machine who promised the army’s loyalty to the “bloodline”. This “Korea watcher” assumes that the Military is already running the show and simply needs an orderly transition of power for a figurehead to ensure continuity.

To the point of all this is to bring your attention to an article in this morning’s New York Times. Diplomatic Storm Brewing Over Korean Peninsula. Wars start in the most unlikely places. America’s strength has always been in the readiness of our war machine. Our war machine is a bit overextended, our troops are tired, and we (America) are “broke”. Our Asian security umbrella consists of a number of domino-like “IOU’s” that would be difficult to pay if called in. China similarly has a security agreement with North Korea, a Military machine that’s technically up to date, an unlimited supply of troops, no internal domestic resistance (that they can’t handle), and their own reasons for a surprising course of action should North and South Korea “come to blows”. I would suggest our Secretary of State get ahead of this situation quickly with a pragmatic solution that doesn’t give North Korea a reason to try out its war machine (and destroy Seoul in the process).

If you haven’t served with, lived with, worked with, and studied the oriental mind… you just won’t get the potential here. While we worry about what happens next year, China and other Asian nations think in terms of Centuries. While I am a proponent of economic ties and free markets as the road to peace, that assumes peace under todays political model is the goal of the involved nations. I’m not sure that’s the case. This would give China an excellent reason to enter the game on North Korea’s side to settle a few scores, establish itself at the head of the world table both economically and militarily, seek a bit of overdue revenge on Japan, settle the Taiwan issue, and humiliate the United States for the years of humiliation it has suffered at our hands for good measure. The price of bad economic policy, one too many wars, and continued deficit spending by the current Administration has weakened our power to respond militarily to threats such as this. To think China hasn’t noticed would be a mistake. To suspect someone is looking for a fight without their fingerprints wouldn’t be a stretch of the imagination. We just can’t cash an “arrogance” check when responding to military threats at the moment. This should be handled diplomatically.

This is just my opinion… but watch this space.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Now… that really felt good!

Al Alborn www.alborn.net

I just deactivated my Facebook account. I was working on a book about public policy; however, my publisher suggested my recent experiences delving into all flavors of political activism might be more interesting. I’ll need to concentrate and I have found Facebook to be a profound distraction. I still plan to post occasionally on jeffersonconservative.com and maintain my own blog at http://alborn.blogspot.com/ I’ll also be at my favorite Starbucks every Wednesday at 1:00 for anyone interested in talking face to face (something I’m beginning to appreciate much more lately).

For those of you who enjoy Facebook… enjoy! I just decided to take the “book” out of my dialog for a while and focus on the “face” (as in face to face) part.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

National Debt = Public Debt. Your and My Current Debt: $12,926,689,780,236.68 as of 2010.05.18

by Bill Golden
aka Bill4DogCatcher.com & JeffersonConservative.com

Our public national debt can be sliced and diced many ways.

Lots of pundits exist that will help you figure out what the numbers are. The U.S. Department of the Treasury provides all Americans with the tools necessary to understand the extent, scope and basis for our public debts at the national level. Just visit TreasuryDirect.gov to learn more.

For the policy wonk in us all (or at least some of us) you can access such things as The Accountability Report which is comprised of the following five separate financial statements:

  • Balance Sheet
  • Statement of Net Cost
  • Statement of Change in Net Position
  • Statement of Budgetary Resources, and
  • Statement of Custodial Activity

Each of these statements account for the outstanding debt recorded by the Bureau of the Public Debt. The Accountability Report for the Bureau of the Public Debt is consolidated into the Performance and Accountability Report for the Department of the Treasury.

Haven’t heard of the Bureau of the Public Debt? Its job is to borrow the money needed to operate the federal government and to account for the resulting debt. In a nutshell, it borrows by selling Treasury bills, notes, and bonds, as well as U.S. Savings Bonds; pays interest to investors; and, when the time comes to pay back the loans, it redeems investors’ securities. Every time the Bureau of the Public Debt borrows or pays back money, it affects the outstanding debt of the United States.

For those of you that would like a more concise yet comprehensive accounting, just follow my link to the most recent monthly report on total national/public debt.

US National Debt as of April 30, 2010

US National Debt as of April 30, 2010

** Refer to the Total Activity (Issues + Redemptions) table on page 2 of the linked Treasury Direct PDF document for more info. Totals may not agree due to rounding.

Posted in National/Public Debt | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Micro Loans – Free Market capitalism helping one family at a time.

By Al Alborn

www.alborn.net

I am an unabashed free market capitalist. I believe that giving people the power to make things and buy and sell those things to one another is the “secret sauce” for pulling families in third world nations out of poverty and bringing peace to the planet. I’ll admit that my free market philosophy has been challenged by the “scale” of modern companies and recognize the value of Government control of large Corporations like WalMart, Exxon, GE and the like. They have grown to become “de facto” Governments deciding who gets to work, where the work will be performed, what will be produced, and where it will be sold. The loss of an ethical component in the free market also worries me. That’s a topic worth talking about for anyone who wants to join me at Starbucks (see previous note); however, I only mention it as a footnote regarding my recognition of problems with large scale capitalism.

The subject of this post is Micro Loans (or micro credit). Simply put, the price worth a month’s worth of Starbucks Latte’s is enough money for a family to start a small business in a third world nation. The amount of money we have in our penny jar could lift a family out of poverty in Africa or India. The cost of taking a family to a movie (with refreshments, of course) could empower a woman in Afghanistan to break free from the oppression of the Taliban. The trick is getting small amounts of money to people who have a desire to start a business and need a bit of capital (or micro credit). The answer is kiva. Kiva’s mission is to connect people, through lending, for the sake of alleviating poverty. It makes small loans (micro loans) to entrepreneurs in third world nations and emerging economies to give them the capital to start a business. As the business grows, these entrepreneurs will start employing their neighbors, pumping capital into the local economy, and create a revenue base for taxes that will support building schools, clinics, and fund social services. This is the free market that people like me care about. It’s a path to pull millions out of poverty and nations into the 21st Century. For more information on Micro Loans and Micro Credit, I recommend Muhammad Yumus’ book, “Creating a World Without Poverty”.

Free markets are an important component of national and international security. You’ll notice that we are busy fighting folks in third world nations these days. Free market capitalists propose that perhaps creating jobs and hope for these people might just give them alternatives. The simple fact is that many of the folks we are fighting over there are doing it for the money. Let’s give them some alternatives that perhaps don’t include shooting at us. If you are interested in free markets as a strategy for national security, I recommend Dr. Tom Barnett’s book, “The Pentagon’s New Map.” You’ll be in very good company if you check it out. Simply put, nations with healthy economies who buy and sell one another their goods don’t tend to go to war to solve their problems.

Is Kiva “the” answer to the world’s problems? No. It is an important part of the answer. Kiva is something that “you” can do today. You don’t need the Government. You don’t need anyone’s permission. You don’t need a sign or a website. All you need is a desire to perhaps help one other human being who wasn’t lucky enough to be born into your circumstances lift themselves, their families, and perhaps their neighbors out of poverty and despair. So… pull out your credit card and make the world a better place. Contrary to popular myth, you can buy happiness… just not necessarily for yourself. Kiva… go there now and check it out for yourself.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Coffee, anyone?

By Al Alborn www.alborn.net

I hang out at the Starbucks on the Corner of Hoadly Road and the Prince William Parkway (12853 Galveston Court, Manassas, VA) quite a bit. It’s my “office” so to speak. Often, my “coffee breaks” turn into “pick-up” conversations about philosophy, religion, politics, community news or whatever. I really enjoy these conversations. Since many of the readers of jeffersonconservative.com are also interested in these conversations, I would love to see some of you there. You will usually find me at Starbucks at 3:00 every Wednesday. By the way, they are running a “Happy Hour” now (from 3:00 to 6:00, I think)… half price Frappuchinos (if you are so inclined).

As for my politics, I’m a Libertarian who belongs to the Coffee Party, the Tea Party, and several other groups. Since I’m an independent voter, I’m on just about every mailing list (Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, etc.) . I’m also a Virginia Master Gardener and Master Naturalist and very interested in environmental issues. While I’m happy to talk to anyone, I am particularly interested in meeting people with whom perhaps I disagree. I value most being convinced that I’m wrong about something.

This is an experiment in communications. If you want to talk about anything, you know when and where to find me. If the weather’s nice, I’ll be outside under an umbrella.

Al

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off

An apology to JeffersonConservative.com readers and Morris ("Moe") Davis from Al Alborn

Sometimes, I make a mistake. When I do make a mistake… I do what my father taught me to do on the farm, admit it, apologize, and move on.

I just took down a post because it was just wasn’t fair. I could make excuses; however, I won’t. Colonel Morris Davis (“Moe”) correctly pointed out that it appeared I was talking about an email that he sent. I was. His was one of many alerting me of a piece of pending legislation and asking for my support. It was one of perhaps a dozen of varying passion and intensity pointing out the horrible fate that would befall the United States if I didn’t vote “for” or “against” the legislation in question (depending on the source). Colonel Davis’ email was actually the only rational communication in the bunch; however, I painted him with the same brush.

I was wrong to not consider his feelings when I wrote that post. Frankly, if anyone else had brought the post to my attention or registered offense with my words I would have ignored him or her. I just can’t ignore Moe Davis. His moral compass has passed (IMHO) the highest test.

I’m sorry for having offended you, Moe. You are correct and I was wrong. I truly apologize for my poor judgment. Feel free to “keep me honest” in the future. We all need a bit of feedback once and a while.

Regards,

Al

Alan P. Alborn

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment