July 21st – Online or Live – Cato Institute Debates Whether Arizona's New Immigration Law Can Survive Challenge

!! This is a free event. No cost to participate.


The Politics and Law of Immigration

POLICY FORUM
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Noon (Luncheon to Follow)

The controversy over America’s immigration policies will ratchet up once the new Arizona law, known as SB 1070, goes into effect on July 29. Can that law withstand the legal challenges that are awaiting it? And legality aside, will the Arizona law create more problems than it can resolve? The federal policy options are no less divisive. Should illegal immigration be reduced by deploying soldiers or by enacting a comprehensive immigration reform bill? Join us for a wide-ranging discussion of the politics and law of immigration policy.

Cato events, unless otherwise noted, are free of charge. To register for this event, please fill out the form below and click submit or email events@cato.org, fax (202) 371-0841, or call (202) 789-5229 by noon, Tuesday, July 20, 2010 . Please arrive early. Seating is limited and not guaranteed. News media inquiries only (no registrations), please call (202) 789-5200.

LIVE:
The Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001

ONLINE:
If you can’t make it to the Cato Institute, watch this forum live online.

Posted in Immigration | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

I've taken sides…

by Al Alborn www.alborn.net alborn.blogspot.com

Charles Richley wrote an excellent Column for today’s (7 July 2010) Manassas News & Messenger. Reichley Column: Jefferson’s Declaration, protest of Va.

This paragraph (taken from the column) pretty much sums up why I am committed to reversing the Liberal and Progressive Movement in America. “Joe Biden explained his concept of the collective will of government in his Iraq Fourth of July speech, saying our independence was about “the willingness to subordinate your individual interest to the communal good.” But Virginia’s founders rejected the notion of sacrificing liberty for security. Indeed, it is our individual liberty, protected by a limited government, which ensures the communal good. Even if government was capable of making things “good,” which the past three years have certainly proven false, the price of subjection to such an abuse of authority is too high.”

Joe Biden’s remarks sound like the Socialist propaganda that came across my desk when I was in the Army. I spent most of my career literally fighting Socialist countries such as the USSR, the People’s Republic of China, North Vietnam, et.al. on active duty… it was my job… I’ve seen this rhetoric before. For the record, we “won” the Cold War.

Those that know me are aware that I am an Independent voter. I voted for Obama because, simple put, I made the mistake of believing him. I would have voted for McCain if McCain has ran as himself (vice as a surrogate for a Republican Party platform with which he really didn’t agree… and I couldn’t support). I know realize that we would have been better off with McCain.

Obama, Biden, Pelosi, and Reid are the face of the Progressive movement in America. They represent a self-appointed political elite who feel endowed by some mystical power to decide what is best for “the rest of us”. These people are the self-appointed aristocracy claiming a right to determine what constitutes (in Joe Biden’s words) “…the collective will of government…”.

In the past, I have talked about “middle ground”, “compromise”, and “bi-partisanship”. I’m not talking in those terms anymore. I now realize that those who purvey those terms are simply attempting to improve their story. They are looking to expand their constituency. They focus on belittling their detractors and opponents. They engage in overt and sophisticated propaganda techniques directed at the American public and the unwitting “useful idiots” (to borrow a term from Lenin) who don’t realize what’s actually going on.

America has always demonstrated a capacity to fight for that which it believes. I am ready to fight for that which I believe using every rhetorical and political tool at my disposal. I do not plan to be soothed by meaningless aphorisms, glittering generalities, quotes from “dead people” taken out of context to prove some esoteric point, subliminal messaging, etc. I will look at the facts in the context of what I value. When evaluating candidates, I will look at their record, listen to their words (both past and present) and hold them to their promises using the enumerated powers of the Constitution and its 27 amendments as my guide. If you wish to join a commune, submit to “the collective will” of some Governing body, I suggest you buy a bit of land out west and start a commune. If you wish to protect the culture of small Government, free enterprise, and personal initiative, I look forward to talking to you.

I’ve taken sides. I’m with the Libertarians and the Conservatives. See you at the poles.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Independents Gaining Momentum As More Americans Reject Party Politics

By Bill Golden
Bill4DogCatcher.com and JeffersonConservative.com

My prediction is that there will be 5-6 independent senators in the U.S. Congress by 2014, many or most will be former Republicans.

These are the Republicans that are generally conservative in nature but centrist in their ability to work with others on that great playground that we call American politics — where rules are usually for the other guy.

Independents will have major impact in 2012 based on their ability to provide critical votes; there should be at least 3 if not 4 independent senators within Congress.

Those parties that do not move to the middle will find their efforts defeated within these critical few votes.

Outside of the senate, independents are picking up some momentum across the country. Recent successful ballot initiatives like California’s no political party primary referendum will help speed up the success of independents and independent-minded members of political parties as voters will no longer have to pick the lesser of two evils (on most days).

======

From this morning’s USAToday:

“Independents gain favor in governors’ races”
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2010-07-05-independents_N.htm

Excerpted:

There are more signs of centrists stirring as national politics remain sharply polarized, a factor some candidates cite for leaving or being pushed from their old allegiances. Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who became an independent candidate for the Senate when the GOP seemed certain to nominate Tea Party favorite Marco Rubio, now leads the three-way field. In California last month, voters approved a constitutional amendment to make primaries open and non-partisan, a measure intended to boost moderate contenders.

“One of the things we’re seeing this year is a voter revolt against the extremes in both parties and a desire to find candidates who can be elected from the middle and who can govern from the middle,” says Eliot Cutler, a former Carter administration official who is running as an independent for governor of Maine.

Posted in Independents | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

A Long Story Short: Conservative Principles And Lack of Believability

by Bill Golden
JeffersonConservative.com and Bill4DogCatcher.com

We conservatives must be believable if we want to be believed.

We need vision and firm answers to real problems. We have failed that standard miserably.

We’ve hidden behind ‘principles’ when reality is that we are too worried about answering the hard questions.

The price: even conservatives, such as myself, doubt the motives and intentions of other conservatives just as strongly as the liberals and moderates do.

“I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions, I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because, when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know, also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times.”
–Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, 1816.

Posted in Political Process, Quotes, Thomas Jefferson | Tagged , | Comments Off

Government's Role in Creating Innovative Infrastructure and thus Jobs

by Bill Golden
JeffersonConservative.com and Bill4DogCatcher.com

What role should the federal government play in creating the conditions for jobs creation?

Many conservatives and libertarians would tell you the role should be none, let the market sort things out. As someone that believes government’s role in our lives should be minimal, there is a proper role for government: infrastructure innovation. ‘Infrastructure’ serves the public at both the individual and business level.

However, merely throwing money into public infrastructure programs is not a good enough standard. Infrastructure innovation must have a high probability of success and should be as valuable to public on the day after tomorrow as it is on the day it becomes available for use. The standard should be that government is innovating and creating a public good that the public will use in life, work and play.

One such project is the creation of electric refueling stations for electric cars. Currently there are only 465 public electric refueling stations in the entire USA. Stimulus funds are being spent to create 15,000 such refueling points in 13 cities in fall 2010. This is known as the ‘EV Project’ and deployment coincides with commercial sales of Nissan’s Leaf and GM’s Volt electric cars.

The cost to the taxpayer: $100 million.

Is this a worthy cost, spending approximately $6653 per electric refueling point? The short answer is that we must hold our breath and see. We must see if Nissan and GM really deliver their cars. We must hope that those cars work as advertised.

Certainly success in the EV Project endeavor will create many jobs and new career paths.

But there are questions:

? Isn’t this also corporate welfare? Spending $100 million so that Nissan and GM have the infrastructure so that people will buy their cars?

? Are all refueling points truly public?

? Are there some greater public infrastructure investments that are more practical, such as wind farms in these 13 cities?

? Are the companies receiving these funds, almost all of which stand to profit handsomely if the projects work out, going to plow a percentage of their success back into growing the infrastructure? Or will they distribute the profits and come back to government with hands out for another round of ‘let’s do good’ public funding?

Learn more about the EV Project.

Posted in Energy | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

Andy Grove: How America Can Create Jobs

by Al Alborn www.alborn.net

For years, I always advises American businesses to “measure twice and cut once”. Andy Grove taught me that “measuring once correctly” was a much better strategy.

I’m amazed that folks who never held a private sector job let alone started a business are trying to solve America’s unemployment problem. It’s like asking an English Professor to fix your plumbing… they just don’t have the skills or experience. If you haven’t spent any time in the private sector (particularly in a small business start-up), I suggest you stick to giving advice on those things with which you are familiar. Leave the money in the pockets of America’s entrepreneurs as they are the source of new jobs and prosperity.

Andy Grove has the skills and experience… and some very good advice. and some good advice. Andy Grove: How America Can Create Jobs

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Tea Party Adieu … Jefferson Sought Reasoned Argument And So Do I

by Bill Golden
JeffersonConservative.com aka Bill4DogCatcher.com

I wish the Tea Party well. Have met many fine people, many smart and concerned people. But it is time to say adieu!

America needs more than concern. America needs leadership. The Tea Party has become a form of anarchy that is undermining our Republic.

It has become anarchic in that many of its members feel free to attack almost every aspect of our republican democracy without also feeling compelled to state what policies they would pursue. Reasoned debate within Tea Party online discussion areas quickly degenerates into red, white and blue flag waving without regard for fact or real debate. This is not me.

The three core concerns of the Tea Party (Patriots) are my concerns:

  • Fiscal Responsibility
  • Constitutionally Limited Government
  • Free Markets

As a Jeffersonian I will continue to embrace these issues.

If Jefferson were alive today I do believe that he would have become active in the Tea Party movement. And I believe that Jefferson would have also moved on to seek other ways and groups to pursue fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government, and debate about the best way to establish and to sustain those elusive free markets.

We need to debate and to seek solutions together as Americans. Jefferson and Madison and the many other founders of our nation were absolutely brillant in the path that they created for us to follow as a nation going forward.

Our forebears also realized that times change. Circumstances are never the same. ‘We the people’ may not agree with the prior generation of ‘we the people’.

Thomas Jefferson constantly was concerned that government was becoming too powerful, yet he also looked to the people to decide for themselves — realizing that the choices of his fellow Americans may not be his choices.

    Jefferson, 1788: “We are now vibrating between too much and too little government, and the pendulum will rest finally in the middle.” — written to Samuel Smith, 1788.

    Jefferson, 1792: “Every people may establish what form of government they please, and change it as they please, the will of the nation being the only thing essential.” — Anas, 1792

    Jefferson, 1815: “Difference of opinion leads to enquiry, and enquiry to truth; and I am sure…we both value too much the freedom of opinion sanctioned by our Constitution, not to cherish its exercise even where in opposition to ourselves.” — written to P. H. Wendover, 1815.

    Jefferson, 1817: “Ignorance and bigotry, like other insanities, are incapable of self-government.” — written to Lafayette, 1817.

    Jefferson, 1820: “We exist, and are quoted, as standing proofs that a government, so modeled as to rest continually on the will of the whole society, is a practicable government.” — written to Richard Rush, 1820.

    Jefferson, 1824: “I have learned to be less confident in the conclusions of human reason, and give more credit to the honesty of contrary opinions.” — written to Edward Livingston, 1824.

Again, I have met many fine and justly concerned Americans in the Tea Party movement. I am moving on because largely the Tea Party has not embraced that great Jeffersonian conversation and debate about where America could and should be going. The Tea Party has become largely a loosely organized anarchy against government in general without ideas or proposed policies, and most certainly of all there is very little potential for honest debate under the Tea Party banner except privately among individual members.

Posted in Tea Party | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off

The Ugly Party vs. the Grown-Up Party

by Al Alborn www.alborn.net

I had an interesting chat with Bill Golden, a fellow “curious mind”, this morning (on my front porch over probably too many cups of Italian Espresso) about the current tone some folks take when discussing politics. We were comparing what appears to be an evolving bigotry and intolerance directed towards those with whom certain folks disagree politically with other types of prejudice. Neither of us had issues about folks disagreeing with us when they explain “why”; however, there appears to be a subset of folks out there who never get around to explaining “why”… they just don’t like folks “not like them”.

The reason for this post is an article that appeared in the New York This Morning => The Ugly Party vs. the Grown-Up Party It pretty much summarized how I feel about the issue. The fact that someone disagrees with me is a “good thing” because we are talking (the first step in compromise) and perhaps I’ll learn something (because I always accept that I may be wrong or learn something that alters my view of the world).

To use the words of the New York Times, these folks belong to the “Ugly Party”. They contribute little to the conversation other than hate. They transcend labels and may be found in all groups (Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Liberals, Conservatives, whatever). My personal experience is that they never really get around to explaining why they “hate” you because that doesn’t really appear to be important. In other words, they are part of the “-ism” crowd populated by racists, religious bigots, those with ethnic prejudice, etc. Their world is driven by some imagined stereotype that they can’t quite explain while their vocabulary is one of “hate”.

All I ask of folks like this is a conversation. If you can’t tell me why you hate me, you are irrelevant to this or any other worthwhile conversation and certainly don’t make the world a better place for anyone.

I’m available to talk to anyone who disagrees with me anytime anywhere. Without that conversation, the “Ugly Party” is also the “Ignorant Party”. That’s certainly not a party I want to attend. You’ll find me with the grown-ups… talking.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The free market will take care of itself…

By Al Alborn www.alborn.net

The good news is that the Free Market, when left to its own devices, tends to self regulate (or achieve equilibrium over time). The bad news is this sometimes takes a while. Those of a Liberal or Progressive persuasion are usually not content with the natural order of things and often favor for policy in the name of social justice to “speed things up”. The “problem” with this Keynesian approach is that no one really understands “the math” in any of the economic or social processes we try to help. This results in unintended consequences that often far outweigh the social injustice that liberals and progressives try to address by “speeding things up” a bit. It takes decades to unravel their good intentions. If in doubt, just remember Bill Clinton’s efforts to unravel the United States failed welfare system with his “welfare to workfare” initiative. Likewise, it is my opinion that State, County, and City infrastructure to deliver faith and community based social services has been crippled by the Federal Government’s involvement in what should be local issues and processes.

An example of the free market “Self regulating” is an article in today’s Washington Post Worker Unrest in China signals cheap labor may be a thing of the past. It is the nature of the availability of cheap labor to increase production until “equilibrium” is achieved and perhaps upset in a cycle (labor supply tightens as demand increases). This naturally results in higher production costs, an international change in the balance of trade, currency fluctuation, etc., etc., etc. In today’s tightly coupled global economic environment, world markets will continue to seek cheaper sources of labor until, eventually, all humanity achieves “equilibrium”. Perturbations to the system such as war, famine, social unrest interrupt the process; however, a free market left to its own devices will lift the world out of poverty.

I don’t know what that future world will look like. America created the myth of the “middle class”. The poorest among us actually is ahead in all of the measures that count than most of the rest of the world. I am confident that third world nations will eventually be exploited (not a “bad word” since it contributes to global economic growth and social advancement) as the last source of cheap labor and that those populations will quickly follow China’s path to more empowered workers, better pay, and a higher standard of living for all.

The “problem” is this takes a while. History’s attempts to tinker with the free market have not been kind to our planet (think China, the Soviet Union and more recently Venezuela). Large scale socialist Governments have proven themselves to be particularly dramatic failures. Democracy is the natural incubator for free markets and the fulfillment of human aspirations. Be patient.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

A Third Party?

By Al Alborn www.alborn.net

As anyone who follows this blog or knows me is aware, I’m an independent voter. I’ll admit that I drank the Obama Kool Aid and voted for him. I really like John McCain; however, I didn’t recognize the John McCain that actually ran… and just couldn’t imagine Sara Palin as a heartbeat away from the Oval Office of something happened. I wish I had taken my chances.

Be that as it may, there’s another election coming up. Like many independent voters, I give every candidate the “sniff” test to see how their record and campaign rhetoric matches my personal beliefs. Usually, I end up compromising by picking the “lesser of two evils” between candidates. To explore my options, I belong to many groups and listen to what both political parties have to say.

I’ve noticed a trend in Prince William County that probably follows a National Trend: a “third party” emerging from the Republican Party. Republicans have basically divided into two camps: traditional fiscal conservatives who try to look for compromise while avoiding the most divisive social issues and Tea Party Patriots who represent the most extreme right views with little taste for compromise. I’m really not sure which one actually will emerge as the “third party”; however, both represent an alternative path for the Republican Party. The Democratic Party has always had a few “Blue Dog Democrats” within their midst. These candidates offer a viable alternative. Unfortunately, President Obama, Madam Speaker Pelosi, and Senator Reid all appear to be leading a resurgence of the Progressive Movement.

It would appear (IMHO) the Tea Party Patriots are emerging nationally as the stronger of the two. This is “bad news” for the Republican Party because it forces the Independent Voter to “choose” between the Extreme Right and whatever the alternative might be. The only thing that I fear more than the Extreme Right candidate is a Progressive Candidate. I would be willing to compromise on those “divisive social issues” for a Term (I always think one term at a time) to avoid voting for the path to National Socialism.

I’ll be voting for Traditional Republicans for the foreseeable future (when I can find one). That means I’ll be voting for Pat Herrity in the Republican Primary tomorrow. Perhaps I’ll see you at the poll?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off